<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>MultiChain Developer Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged administrator</title>
<link>https://www.multichain.com/qa/tag/administrator</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Apply consesnus to add new nodes</title>
<link>https://www.multichain.com/qa/13715/apply-consesnus-to-add-new-nodes</link>
<description>Is there a possibility to add (grant &amp;nbsp;connect &amp;nbsp;permission to new nodes ) node through a consensus mechanism involving multiple nodes in multichain?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.multichain.com/qa/13715/apply-consesnus-to-add-new-nodes</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is it possible to add new permisson voting for connect permission?</title>
<link>https://www.multichain.com/qa/11776/it-possible-add-new-permisson-voting-for-connect-permission</link>
<description>As it stands, only upgrade, admin, activate, mine, create and issue permissions can be voted to be granted or revoked by a percentage of the blockchain's admins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wondering if we could add admin-consensus-connect to the list. This would help make the chain more secure by removing the threat of a single admin crippling it buying removing all connect permissions for other nodes while maintaining the ability to remove any malicious nodes</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.multichain.com/qa/11776/it-possible-add-new-permisson-voting-for-connect-permission</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 13:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Connect permisson delima</title>
<link>https://www.multichain.com/qa/11687/connect-permisson-delima</link>
<description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been experimenting with MC and I encountered this scenario: Any of the admin nodes on a a network can solely throttle it by just revoking the connect permission to all the other nodes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to look for a way to limit such a behaviour (something like admin-consensus-connect) but I couldn't find any, and in the scenario I am trying to build, I require multiple admin nodes in order to avoid a single point of failure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking forward to your thoughts on the matter</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.multichain.com/qa/11687/connect-permisson-delima</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>About multichain administrator attack</title>
<link>https://www.multichain.com/qa/7537/about-multichain-administrator-attack</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; If we use administrator to give permission to all other nodes in blockchain, then it would be a kind of centralized system. And if the administrator is attacked/ hacked or controlled by the attacker then there will be a single point of failure as in case of centralized system. How can we handle this problem in multichain? In &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.multichain.com/developers/permissions-management/&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.multichain.com/developers/permissions-management/&quot;&lt;/a&gt; at section &quot;Permissions consensus&quot;; it states that &quot;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;Depending on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://www.multichain.com/developers/blockchain-parameters/&quot;&gt;blockchain parameters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;, a single administrator may not be able to grant or revoke&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;admin&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;activate&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;mine&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;issue&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;create&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:helvetica neue,helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;permissions on their own. Instead, a number of administrators are required to agree on the same change, and only then is it applied. This ensures that a single rogue administrator is not able to unilaterally decide who has the right to perform the blockchain’s most critical tasks.....&lt;/span&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does this mean we need to have multiple administrators in a single chain of multichain? or there will me multiple administrator in a single blockchain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My goal is to have multiple parallel blockchain with each blockchain in each province of the country for example.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can you please clarify on this issue? Than you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.multichain.com/qa/7537/about-multichain-administrator-attack</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>